Search This Site
News & Public Notices
HOME
US Constitution/Bill of Rights
About Us
Goals & Objectives
ABOUT DURHAM N.Y.
The People of Durham
Hamlets & Neighborhoods
Photo Tours & Albums
Weather in Durham
Town Government
FOR THE PEOPLE
Tools & Resources
What is "QoL & SoL" ?
Community Metrics
Town Mtg Recordings
Town Mtg Mins 2005-2009
Town Officials' Report Card
Property Tax Roll
Our Tax $ At Work
Economic Development
Crime
Town Court
NYS Law Re Public Officers
Campaign/Election Finance
Ethics Glossary
NYS Law Resources
BY THE PEOPLE
Voting & Elections
FOIL
Open Meetings
Environment Search & FOIL
VOICE OF THE PEOPLE
Sunshine: The Blog
Durham's Durhty Local LEOs
Durhty Local LEOs, Part 2
WWWTP?
Tipline
Forum
Community Survey
Community Polls
FOR THE COMMUNITY
Calendar
Events
Sunshine Week
Reporters Wanted
Contact Us
   
 




Durham Greene County New York is a community of 2,592 persons (according to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2000 Decennial Census) -- each and every one of whom has hopes and dreams and talents and gifts and insights and strengths and struggles and challenges. And a voice. And as citizens of the United States of America and of The Great State of New York, each one enjoys the rights and privileges -- and bears the responsibilities -- that come with citizenship in a democracy.

It is our goal by this work to enable the community members of Durham New York to work together collaboratively, openly, forthrightly, and with integrity toward making our community one whose citizens all enjoy a model Quality of Life enabled by truly democratic, participatory citizenship based on Open & Transparent Government.

  

                      Good governance cannot be captured in a "punch list."

Policies are not practices.

Bad policies can lead to bad practices.



Source:

U.S. Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TAX EXEMPT
AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES (ACT)
The Appropriate Role Of The Internal Revenue Service
With Respect To Tax-Exempt Organization Good Governance Issues
June 11, 2008

  


"...the quality of ... governance can mean the difference between cities characterized by prosperity and inclusiveness and cities characterized by decline and social exclusion. ... [I]ncreased transparency at the local level can help in combating ... poverty and enhancing civic engagement. Promoting transparency, through the application of a range of public education, public participation, e-governance, ethics and institutional reform instruments, can:

  • Reduce citizen apathy, by building trust between local governments and other stakeholders, by reducing the opportunities for corruption at the local level, and by engaging all stakeholders in identifying development needs and setting priorities;
  • Make service delivery contribute to poverty reduction, not only in improving the overall effectiveness of services, but also in terms of making services accessible to more citizens on an equitable basis;
  • Increase city revenues, by increasing citizen confidence that the taxes collected are being used to improve the city, and by demonstrating the rule of law, particularly regarding contracts and property rights;
  • Raise ethical standards, by enhancing the quality of political and professional leadership and instilling a sense of public service among elected, appointed and potential officials."

Source:

Transparency International
and
United Nations (U.N.) Human Settlements Programme
Tools to Support Transparency in Local Governance

           

According to the Ethics Resource Center's 2008 National Government Ethics Survey (NGES):

         "...almost two thirds of local government employees (63%) said they
observed at least one type of misconduct in the previous year."

The study also showed that of the 63% of local government employees that had observed misconduct in their work, more than one-third failed to act: "Local government had the highest level of workers who witnessed misconduct but did not report it – 34%. That compares with 29% at the state level and 25% within federal agencies." 

According to the study, the most commonly observed types of misconduct at the local level of government were:

  • Abusive behavior (26%);
  • Putting own interests ahead of the organization (26%); and
  • Internet abuse (23%)

Source:

Ethics Resource Center
http://www.ethics.org/


DurhamForThePeople.org:
Community Renewal and Growth Through Open & Transparent Government